Information
Week US reports on a huge victory for common sense this week. Yes, Google has managed
to overcome yet another law suit, this time over an obviously ludicrous libel
claim that, had they lost, would have set a dangerous precedent for
communications, customer service and the freedom of information on the
internet.
The claim,
and I won’t mention any names for fear of litigation, you can read about them
in the Information Week article, was that Google should be held liable for
third party comments that appear in its search results. You know that
derogatory blog post that’s taken on a life of its own in the search results? The
one that outranks your own website? Or the forum where customers keep saying
your product is faulty or dangerous? The company basically wanted Google to
admit liability for anything possibly libellous said about them that appears in
its search results.
Well,
unfortunately for the lazy communicators out there, and thankfully for those
with a shred of common sense, the company lost. You aren’t simply going to be
able to sue Google and get any derogatory comment removed. Shame…
It’s
important that this case went the way it did, firstly because its obvious that
a search engine is there for presenting you with all the information it deems
relevant to your search enquiry, It is NOT there to block and selectively
present corporate-approved content; we have seen the impact of content blocking
and filtering in various locations around the world and it simply doesn’t and shouldn’t
work. The second point is that filtering such comments would be to negate a
huge part of what the web is about – a forum for feedback and communication.
So, someone
says something bad about your company or product. Taking the legal route
nowadays will frequently turn dissenting voices into a movement and a movement
will gain even more interest, followers and even mass-media coverage. Scary
stuff.
SO ENGAGE!
Find out what the issue is. Find out whether it’s true, If it is, fix it, If it
isn’t engage with those that are saying it and present the correct, evidenced
case.
Make sense?