Blog powered by TypePad
Bookmark and Share

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

« January 2008 | Main | March 2008 »

February 2008

February 26, 2008

Nissan – a big mistake?

Just what is Nissan thinking? Once again we turn on our televisions to see a global company breaking textbook rules of reputation management – don’t disrespect your customers!

Lucky for them, Nissan’s latest Navarra pick-up truck has received a real slating from the Euro NCAP safety organisation for posing an 'unacceptably high risk of life-threatening injury' to adult passengers. The problems include slow airbags, seatbelt problems and even questions on the integrity of the chassis.

Acting more like a small company caught in the headlights of media fury than the savvy, caring and green company we’ve been led to believe, Nissan is being surprisingly blasé about these problems.

Rather than opting for the rapid, controlled and open response that is necessary in such public failures, Nissan has opted to divert attention with news that its newer versions don’t have these problems. It has also stated that current customers can get their airbag problems fixed at a Nissan dealership.

The trouble is that this response fails to recognise the most worrying issue – the chassis. Media and industry figures are calling for a complete recall but this is likely to be an outlay that Nissan doesn’t want. The people at the top would do well to review the Firestone failure of the 90s to see the painfully close link between bottom line and reputation.

The fact is that Nissan’s response just won’t cut it for today’s customers or media. Complete recall is the only way to show that you truly care about your customers. Anything less says that bottom line is more important than customer safety and puts company reputation severely on the line.

The Premier League - how not to communicate

An institution revered around the world. Its progress followed by millions. Dreams cradled in its arms. A shining beacon of…incompetence.

The FA Premier League has achieved global acclaim by delivering a product that the masses have lapped up, wanting ever more live football to quench the insatiable thirst. Yet in suggesting its new initiative, a 39th game in the regular season, the communications strategy of the Premier League was quite spectacularly ill-thought through.

Within hours of the news breaking, it had been wholeheartedly condemned by potential stakeholders – managers, chairmen, the Football Association and even the countries that the Premier League imagined would host games. Surely the Premier League should have consulted all interested parties before breaking this to the shocked and hyper-critical media.

Information is a basic building-block of any communications strategy, particularly if there will inevitably be a measure of disaster recovery within it - and even the hapless Premier League chairman Richard Scudamore must have imagined that there would be a level of criticism. In order to present this story to the media, Scudamore and the Premier League should have had lengthy negotiations with everyone who could possibly put a dampener on the idea. The proposal could then have been amended to deal with the issues posed by some of its more vitriolic critics. Now they have had to beat a hasty retreat, as the world waits for the next hair-brained scheme to fill the papers and then disappear without trace.